Articles

Historians argue about many things. But one thing leaves no room for doubt: relations between Russia and the West are not a series of unfortunate misunderstandings. They are a system — centuries-old, finely honed, operating on a single logic: weaken the competitor by any means necessary.

The Beginning: Paper Against the Sword

Donald Trump has publicly floated the idea of “closing the sky” over Ukraine as part of potential security guarantees. Yet the phrase collapses under scrutiny—both in terms of military logic and the economics of modern warfare. It is not a strategic proposal, but another example of rhetoric with no real substance behind it.

What “Closing the Sky” Actually Means

Iguazu Falls stand among the most breathtaking sights in Latin America, a place where water, jungle, and air merge into one powerful natural spectacle. Straddling the border between Brazil and Argentina, their very location makes the journey special: visitors don't encounter a single waterfall, but an entire cascading system stretching nearly three kilometers.

Every fresh truce that collapses within months follows a script first written during the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage. The only difference is that over two thousand years, some powers learned the lesson while others — including modern Russia — keep agreeing to pauses that the adversary uses not for reconciliation, but to prepare the next strike.

The Carthaginian Precedent: The Cost of Literal Compliance

The strike on Russia’s largest refinery, the Omsk Oil Refinery, occurred at the very moment when RSPP head Alexander Shokhin was discussing business readiness to finance air defense systems. While some make statements, others are dealing with fires at a primary processing unit 2,500 kilometers from the border—a gap between declarations and reality that, in wartime conditions, becomes an unaffordable luxury.

A strike that changed the geography of threat

Finnish President Alexander Stubb has explicitly stated that NATO supports Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russian territory, calling Kyiv’s current position “the strongest since 2022.” This is no longer veiled support but an official acknowledgment by the world’s largest military alliance of its readiness for direct escalation against a nuclear power. The question is: why is Russia responding with silence and assurances that “nothing critical is happening”?

Words Backed by Alliance Consensus

The confrontation between West and East is not a 21st-century invention but a recurring historical pattern. Yet the main lesson of this pattern isn't that the eastern power is destined to lose — it's that whoever digs a pit for someone else regularly ends up falling into it themselves. Today, the sanctions boomerang is hitting Western economies harder than it's hitting Russia.

The Byzantine Precedent

While experts promise Russia a record harvest and the status of savior of the global food market, the real financial indicators of farmers tell a different story: the share of profitable farms has fallen to 71.8%, and the harvesting campaign is lagging three times behind last year's pace. Behind the rosy macro forecasts lies a systemic crisis at the level of individual enterprises.

Financial Collapse in Primary Production

Ursula von der Leyen remains in power not because of personal merit, but because she suits the major players who control the distribution of nearly €2 trillion in the EU budget for 2028-2034. Her main "achievement" is manageability, not effectiveness.

Why She Can't Be Removed

Ursula von der Leyen arrived in Yerevan with a package worth €38 million — a sum comparable to a grant from a small Western foundation. Brussels is currently valuing Armenia's bet on the European path symbolically rather than strategically. Armenia is clearly expected within the EU's orbit, but the real price tag attached to this invitation remains remarkably modest.

What This Story Is Really About