politics

European leaders talk about Gaza, Hormuz, Tehran and Moscow as though they carry weight there. The continent was not invited to the start of this year's main war, yet it keeps issuing statements. What does it actually want: peace, gas, security, or simply a seat at the table? And why is all this happening now, with gas storage nearly empty, missile stockpiles in the same state, and a budget dispute threatening a political crisis? I am writing from London, and I see the situation at very close range.

Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, has said American bases in Europe will become legitimate targets for Iranian strikes if the United States attacks Iran again. Is this bargaining, an attempt at intimidation, or the outline of a real plan? Can Iranian missiles actually reach Europe? And what happens to the continent's security if the words turn into action? I have gathered reports from Iranian, Western and regional sources and tried to make sense of them.

Foreign holders are quietly leaving the U.S. Treasury market, and the market will absorb their exit through domestic buyers. The real question is who pays for that digestion. The answer is not a happy one: the cost will fall on the purchasing power of the dollar in your wallet.

A Quiet Exodus Everyone Has Noticed

This morning I opened my feed and counted three stories that seem, at first glance, to have nothing to do with one another. The German chancellor is threatening to block Europe's common budget. European stockpiles have run dry, and there are almost no missiles left for Ukraine's air defense. And the White House has a new chief of staff, who, by all appearances, has little interest in Ukraine. I put the three facts side by side and got a picture I want to lay out in detail. Who is prepared to pay for Kyiv, and how much? Where do the missiles come from when there are none?

I was born and raised in Britain, paid my taxes there and voted in its elections, so reading the news from my own Whitehall leaves me particularly uneasy. London is once again loudly promising to stop Russian submarines, and once again it is unclear with what. Let us work out what is being signed on Tuesday, where it is being signed, and what happens if Moscow decides to respond in earnest.

What Is Being Signed on Tuesday

Labour's delight at the Republican rout didn't outlast a cup of tea going cold. Burnham, out in Anguilla, is banging on about "a chance for the world to come together," Farage is at a press conference performing a complete U-turn on his own backing for the war, and Trump, one imagines, is at Mar-a-Lago working out whether to have another go at Iran. Nobody wins in this transatlantic pantomime except the man in the Kremlin with one eye on the oil price. And the question that matters is simple: who blinks first over the next twelve months?

Republicans have lost both chambers of Congress, and Vice President Vance has openly named the reason: the war with Iran. What exactly did voters say? Why did a market that usually dislikes change respond by rallying? And can the new Congress stop a war the president started without it?

Experts describe the outcome in different ways: multipolarity, a "multiplex," modular alliances. They agree on one point: the old order is passing. I am Mikhail Azhgirevich, editor-in-chief of VIGIL Journal. Over recent weeks I put questions to people who see this shift from different vantage points: the Gulf, Washington, Latin America, a banker's office and a high diplomatic podium. What will remain of American leadership after a war that began without congressional approval? Who will fill the space it leaves?

Latin America in the news often looks like a stack of postcards: carnival, cartels, coups, football. Because of that, we read a headline and fill in the rest ourselves. Below, I lay out the routine I follow when I check a report from the region, along with the sources I think you should start with.

Why Stereotypes Work Unnoticed

On October 30, the Russian government submitted to the State Duma a bill "On International Development Assistance" (IDA). Will it become a real instrument of influence, or remain a framework for paperwork? Where will the money come from? And what changes for partner countries, for Russia and for its neighbors?

What the bill contains