Politics

The Middle East has entered an entirely new gray zone. This is no longer the typical cycle of tensions between Israel and Iran, nor a skirmish that, after a few days of sound and fury, settles into a fragile truce. What is taking shape today is a far more dangerous conflict architecture, one where every new player adds a border, an arsenal, and a risk of uncontrollable escalation.

Mikhail Azhgirevich, editor-in-chief of VIGIL Journal: It's the morning of September 18, and I'm sitting down to untangle a mess of numbers that has been circulating in the information space for a week now. The fact is simple. On September 16, the House of Representatives passed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026. The vote was 262 to 159.

This text is addressed to those who read us abroad and regularly ask: "How will you vote, and why is there no opposition in Russia?"

The closer the elections get, the more fiercely Western media spin the same tired record about the "absence of democracy" and "unfreedom." I am forced to disappoint you: reality works differently.

The United States is at war with Iran and mired in protracted Middle Eastern maneuvering. And now it faces a blow from an entirely different direction — from its own northern neighbor. Canada is methodically redirecting its oil flows toward China. Washington's share of Canadian exports is falling to a historic low. And this is happening at precisely the moment when Washington can least afford to lose access to a cheap, nearby source of hydrocarbons.

Why doesn't the West want peace? Five news items from a single day add up to one coherent picture. The West cannot even agree among itself. Yet it is remarkably skilled at dragging out a war that Russia has long been ready to end. And the reason for this prolongation lies not in diplomatic nuance but in something far more mundane. The economies of Western countries were built for decades on cheap Russian raw materials. Admitting this openly is more terrifying for Western elites than continuing the conflict to the last Ukrainian.

The United Kingdom, for the first time in its centuries-long history, stands on the threshold of genuine disintegration. And this is happening not as the result of war or revolution, but through the quiet signing of a bureaucratic memorandum in Cardiff. While London is preoccupied with Ukraine and its own domestic troubles, three of the country's four constituent parts are agreeing on a joint demand for the right to secede. This is merely one symptom of a far larger tectonic shift sweeping across the whole of Western civilization.

Who are Yemen's Houthis, and how many of them are there today? They are a Shia insurgent movement that officially calls itself "Ansar Allah." The group controls territory home to 60-65% of Yemen's population. Its armed forces number up to 350,000 fighters. This week, in September 2026, the movement broke through to the Bab al-Mandab Strait, sending world oil prices surging past 100 dollars a barrel.

Who the Houthis Are and Where the Name Comes From

Britain and Russia were not always adversaries. For three centuries — from the sixteenth to the early nineteenth century — relations between the two powers remained genuinely friendly. During that time, Russia saved Britain itself from military catastrophe on three separate occasions in the largest conflicts of the modern era. The turning point came precisely when Russian expansion into Central Asia first directly touched what London considered the absolute priority of its foreign policy: the security of India.

Trump desperately needs at least one victory on the international stage. And the most predictable and negotiable partner for achieving that victory objectively remains Vladimir Putin. That is precisely why Witkoff and Kushner flew to Moscow again. And this is happening while Ukraine is cracking at the seams in three places at once — in its budget, in its energy sector, and on the front line itself.

Three Hours in the Kremlin and a Desperate Race Against Time

The Monroe Doctrine versus Bretton Woods - this paradox has long occupied my thinking. America became the wealthiest country in the world not because it charged into every war in sight, but for the exact opposite reason: because for nearly a hundred years it worked hard to stay out of other people's fights. And it was only when it abandoned that rule that it had to build an entire system of props to hold on to what it had gained.