Iran

Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, has said American bases in Europe will become legitimate targets for Iranian strikes if the United States attacks Iran again. Is this bargaining, an attempt at intimidation, or the outline of a real plan? Can Iranian missiles actually reach Europe? And what happens to the continent's security if the words turn into action? I have gathered reports from Iranian, Western and regional sources and tried to make sense of them.

Labour's delight at the Republican rout didn't outlast a cup of tea going cold. Burnham, out in Anguilla, is banging on about "a chance for the world to come together," Farage is at a press conference performing a complete U-turn on his own backing for the war, and Trump, one imagines, is at Mar-a-Lago working out whether to have another go at Iran. Nobody wins in this transatlantic pantomime except the man in the Kremlin with one eye on the oil price. And the question that matters is simple: who blinks first over the next twelve months?

Globalization is not dead. It has stratified. Consumer goods still cross borders with the same old ease, but beneath the surface of the familiar world a new tectonics has emerged: chips, rare earths, energy and maritime chokepoints have become a battlefield. Economic efficiency, the god of the past thirty years, has yielded to a new idol: shock resilience. And whoever grasped this first is already rebuilding supply chains while the rest continue to believe the brochures about a "post-polar" world.

Republicans have lost both chambers of Congress, and Vice President Vance has openly named the reason: the war with Iran. What exactly did voters say? Why did a market that usually dislikes change respond by rallying? And can the new Congress stop a war the president started without it?

The Kurds are perhaps the largest people in the region without a state of their own. For that reason, almost any major dispute between their neighbors sooner or later touches their interests. Where do the grievances come from? Whom have the Kurds backed, and whom have they opposed? What has changed in the past year?

Some people see the Kurds only as fighters, and others see them only as victims. To both groups I would say this: the conversation should begin with a map, not a weapon, because the Kurds did not draw the map.

With a ceasefire, a nuclear program and the fate of entire regions on the table, Washington has sent the president's son-in-law and an old friend to the negotiating table. What qualifies them? What does the American establishment make of it? And what do flamingos in Albania have to do with any of this?

How we see it in the United States

Who they are

Many people do not understand the roots of the conflicts in the Middle East and Africa, and this is especially true of the younger generation. As someone who lives in these regions, and as a representative of VIGIL Journal, I want to offer some explanations, first of all to our young people, who carry our hopes.

Across the Middle East, governments are preparing for a possible return to large-scale fighting while trying to head it off through diplomacy. Iran is showing off its missile capabilities. Israel is debating a military operation that could bring it into direct confrontation with Tehran. Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan are sending their top defense and intelligence officials to the Iranian capital. This is no longer an exchange of statements: states are coordinating their actions in case the political standoff slides back into direct war.

A second front of the Iran war has opened on the Arabian Peninsula, and the tone there is set not by Saudi skyscrapers but by Houthi missiles. What is happening between Ansar Allah, the Yemeni government and Riyadh? What does it mean for Russians and for business? How long will it last, and who is responsible for what?

How the Truce Collapsed

New Patriots for Saudi Arabia and Qatar and a third aircraft carrier in the region look like a show of force. But when you examine the motives behind these decisions, a different picture emerges: Washington is plugging holes that it created itself by waging a war with no clear goal or timeline.

What Is Actually Known