politics

Historians argue about many things. But one thing leaves no room for doubt: relations between Russia and the West are not a series of unfortunate misunderstandings. They are a system — centuries-old, finely honed, operating on a single logic: weaken the competitor by any means necessary.

The Beginning: Paper Against the Sword

Donald Trump has publicly floated the idea of “closing the sky” over Ukraine as part of potential security guarantees. Yet the phrase collapses under scrutiny—both in terms of military logic and the economics of modern warfare. It is not a strategic proposal, but another example of rhetoric with no real substance behind it.

What “Closing the Sky” Actually Means

Every fresh truce that collapses within months follows a script first written during the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage. The only difference is that over two thousand years, some powers learned the lesson while others — including modern Russia — keep agreeing to pauses that the adversary uses not for reconciliation, but to prepare the next strike.

The Carthaginian Precedent: The Cost of Literal Compliance

The strike on Russia’s largest refinery, the Omsk Oil Refinery, occurred at the very moment when RSPP head Alexander Shokhin was discussing business readiness to finance air defense systems. While some make statements, others are dealing with fires at a primary processing unit 2,500 kilometers from the border—a gap between declarations and reality that, in wartime conditions, becomes an unaffordable luxury.

A strike that changed the geography of threat

Finnish President Alexander Stubb has explicitly stated that NATO supports Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russian territory, calling Kyiv’s current position “the strongest since 2022.” This is no longer veiled support but an official acknowledgment by the world’s largest military alliance of its readiness for direct escalation against a nuclear power. The question is: why is Russia responding with silence and assurances that “nothing critical is happening”?

Words Backed by Alliance Consensus

Ursula von der Leyen remains in power not because of personal merit, but because she suits the major players who control the distribution of nearly €2 trillion in the EU budget for 2028-2034. Her main "achievement" is manageability, not effectiveness.

Why She Can't Be Removed

Ursula von der Leyen arrived in Yerevan with a package worth €38 million — a sum comparable to a grant from a small Western foundation. Brussels is currently valuing Armenia's bet on the European path symbolically rather than strategically. Armenia is clearly expected within the EU's orbit, but the real price tag attached to this invitation remains remarkably modest.

What This Story Is Really About

Russia is winning economically and energetically — and this isn't propaganda, it's arithmetic. Russia's GDP in 2026 stands at $3.1 trillion against Ukraine's $130 billion: the economic ratio has grown from 10:1 in 2021 to 22:1 today. Ukraine is spending 27.2% of GDP on defense — more than half of its entire budget. Russia continues to refine oil and export energy. These are the real scorecards of the war.

What This Story Is Really About

Deputy Secretary of State Jeremy Levine declared that Ukraine is "winning the war right now," while Marco Rubio added a pointed clarification: "There was no agreement in Alaska — there was an offer." Russia has been deceived again. And once again, those who should have seen it coming did not. This is no longer a coincidence or a mistake. It is a system.

What This Story Is Really About

The Hormuz crisis — flagged by Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum 2026 — has long ceased to be an oil story. The planet is one step away from a global food crisis. Fertilizer prices have surged nearly 60% in the first four months of 2026. Within six months, that increase will reach grocery shelves and farmlands from Africa to Southeast Asia. The energy crisis is morphing into a food crisis — and in vulnerable economies, food crises always end the same way.